<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google and Chrome &#8211; No Go Xero</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.diversity.net.nz/google-and-chrome-no-go-xero/2008/09/03/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.diversity.net.nz/google-and-chrome-no-go-xero/2008/09/03/</link>
	<description>Commentary and Analysis for User-Centered Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:02:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Kepes</title>
		<link>http://www.diversity.net.nz/google-and-chrome-no-go-xero/2008/09/03/comment-page-1/#comment-8178</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Kepes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 04:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diversity.net.nz/google-and-chrome-no-go-xero/2008/09/03/#comment-8178</guid>
		<description>@Dennis - you&#039;re wrong if you&#039;re talking about Xero and Chrome - it was that simple. Optimizing an app for the web is hard - taking an existing webapp and making it work on another browser shouldn&#039;t be - witnessed by the fact that Xero just did it a few hours after my post.

Similarly - MYOB BBO does work on Firefox - it just says it doesn&#039;t - it&#039;s more of a communication issue than an engineering one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dennis &#8211; you&#8217;re wrong if you&#8217;re talking about Xero and Chrome &#8211; it was that simple. Optimizing an app for the web is hard &#8211; taking an existing webapp and making it work on another browser shouldn&#8217;t be &#8211; witnessed by the fact that Xero just did it a few hours after my post.</p>
<p>Similarly &#8211; MYOB BBO does work on Firefox &#8211; it just says it doesn&#8217;t &#8211; it&#8217;s more of a communication issue than an engineering one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.diversity.net.nz/google-and-chrome-no-go-xero/2008/09/03/comment-page-1/#comment-8177</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 04:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diversity.net.nz/google-and-chrome-no-go-xero/2008/09/03/#comment-8177</guid>
		<description>@Ben - if it was as simple as that then it would have been done. Optimizing applications for the web is a very big deal. There&#039;s a huge amount of engineering work involved. If they&#039;re removing a lot of that pain then great. But - the payback is a big question mark over data ownership and what Google is actually doing with the data that passes through its cloud. It&#039;s T&#039;s &amp; C&#039;s are screwy. Even so, I don&#039;t see any serious business going for this any time soon. What&#039;s interesting right now is they seem to have problems with Java based applications. That&#039;s just plain weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ben &#8211; if it was as simple as that then it would have been done. Optimizing applications for the web is a very big deal. There&#8217;s a huge amount of engineering work involved. If they&#8217;re removing a lot of that pain then great. But &#8211; the payback is a big question mark over data ownership and what Google is actually doing with the data that passes through its cloud. It&#8217;s T&#8217;s &amp; C&#8217;s are screwy. Even so, I don&#8217;t see any serious business going for this any time soon. What&#8217;s interesting right now is they seem to have problems with Java based applications. That&#8217;s just plain weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.diversity.net.nz/google-and-chrome-no-go-xero/2008/09/03/comment-page-1/#comment-8161</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diversity.net.nz/google-and-chrome-no-go-xero/2008/09/03/#comment-8161</guid>
		<description>Hey guys - we just needed 5 mins to give it a once over before we let everyone at it:

http://blog.xero.com/2008/09/xero-on-chrome/

Just to clarify we do also allow Firefox, IE6, IE7 and Safari 3 which collectively accounts for almost the entire browser market. Thanks for the heads-up on the error page though: we&#039;ve added Safari in there now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys &#8211; we just needed 5 mins to give it a once over before we let everyone at it:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.xero.com/2008/09/xero-on-chrome/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.xero.com/2008/09/xero-on-chrome/</a></p>
<p>Just to clarify we do also allow Firefox, IE6, IE7 and Safari 3 which collectively accounts for almost the entire browser market. Thanks for the heads-up on the error page though: we&#8217;ve added Safari in there now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Day</title>
		<link>http://www.diversity.net.nz/google-and-chrome-no-go-xero/2008/09/03/comment-page-1/#comment-8156</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diversity.net.nz/google-and-chrome-no-go-xero/2008/09/03/#comment-8156</guid>
		<description>Well, they do point out the principal problem, in that current browsers are single threaded (more or less). To shift to a multi-thread model would be a pretty significant re-write of firefox, and to shift to a multi-process model (chrome), they might as well start again, particularly with the security model and the new javascript engine.

I think this is much more significant than &quot;another browser&quot;. This is google saying, we think the OS is dead. Its about the cloud now. Theyve got a lot of work to get people to change, but with my experiences with IE/firefox, I&#039;ll give it a go!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, they do point out the principal problem, in that current browsers are single threaded (more or less). To shift to a multi-thread model would be a pretty significant re-write of firefox, and to shift to a multi-process model (chrome), they might as well start again, particularly with the security model and the new javascript engine.</p>
<p>I think this is much more significant than &#8220;another browser&#8221;. This is google saying, we think the OS is dead. Its about the cloud now. Theyve got a lot of work to get people to change, but with my experiences with IE/firefox, I&#8217;ll give it a go!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Kepes</title>
		<link>http://www.diversity.net.nz/google-and-chrome-no-go-xero/2008/09/03/comment-page-1/#comment-8153</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Kepes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diversity.net.nz/google-and-chrome-no-go-xero/2008/09/03/#comment-8153</guid>
		<description>@Cary - good point, cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Cary &#8211; good point, cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Kepes</title>
		<link>http://www.diversity.net.nz/google-and-chrome-no-go-xero/2008/09/03/comment-page-1/#comment-8152</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Kepes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diversity.net.nz/google-and-chrome-no-go-xero/2008/09/03/#comment-8152</guid>
		<description>@Dennis

1) Xero and some of its evangelists have been critical of MYOB BBO for not being accessible with browsers other than IE - my point was simply that for whatever reason they&#039;re now in the same situation with their own offering. 

And yes it&#039;s about the apps not about the browser - which is why I can&#039;t understand Google doing Chrome - why not just make Firefox work well with Webapps seeing they fund it anyway</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dennis</p>
<p>1) Xero and some of its evangelists have been critical of MYOB BBO for not being accessible with browsers other than IE &#8211; my point was simply that for whatever reason they&#8217;re now in the same situation with their own offering. </p>
<p>And yes it&#8217;s about the apps not about the browser &#8211; which is why I can&#8217;t understand Google doing Chrome &#8211; why not just make Firefox work well with Webapps seeing they fund it anyway</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cary</title>
		<link>http://www.diversity.net.nz/google-and-chrome-no-go-xero/2008/09/03/comment-page-1/#comment-8145</link>
		<dc:creator>Cary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diversity.net.nz/google-and-chrome-no-go-xero/2008/09/03/#comment-8145</guid>
		<description>Actually, there is another problem with that error page from Xero - where&#039;s Safari???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, there is another problem with that error page from Xero &#8211; where&#8217;s Safari???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Day</title>
		<link>http://www.diversity.net.nz/google-and-chrome-no-go-xero/2008/09/03/comment-page-1/#comment-8140</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diversity.net.nz/google-and-chrome-no-go-xero/2008/09/03/#comment-8140</guid>
		<description>yes, googles strategy is to make the OS redundant for a big chunk of the population. They&#039;re trying to relegate windows to a piece of software whose only function is to start up chrome. A chrome boot-strapper if you will.

And then people will write hideously small linux kernals that pretty much do only that, and it will be free, and running on $200 laptops/PDAs/cellphones and everyone will live in the cloud.

Think this might be a &quot;Woh shit&quot; moment for Steve Ballmer...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, googles strategy is to make the OS redundant for a big chunk of the population. They&#8217;re trying to relegate windows to a piece of software whose only function is to start up chrome. A chrome boot-strapper if you will.</p>
<p>And then people will write hideously small linux kernals that pretty much do only that, and it will be free, and running on $200 laptops/PDAs/cellphones and everyone will live in the cloud.</p>
<p>Think this might be a &#8220;Woh shit&#8221; moment for Steve Ballmer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.diversity.net.nz/google-and-chrome-no-go-xero/2008/09/03/comment-page-1/#comment-8132</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diversity.net.nz/google-and-chrome-no-go-xero/2008/09/03/#comment-8132</guid>
		<description>@ben - I don&#039;t see your point. Xero is merely saying it supports 1 of 2 browsers. Presumably you were using something else. 

On Chrome, most people have got this hideously wrong. It&#039;s not about the browser but about apps. Ergo, Chrome is an OS for the web that has an interface we refer to as a browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ben &#8211; I don&#8217;t see your point. Xero is merely saying it supports 1 of 2 browsers. Presumably you were using something else. </p>
<p>On Chrome, most people have got this hideously wrong. It&#8217;s not about the browser but about apps. Ergo, Chrome is an OS for the web that has an interface we refer to as a browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis.tic616</title>
		<link>http://www.diversity.net.nz/google-and-chrome-no-go-xero/2008/09/03/comment-page-1/#comment-8131</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis.tic616</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diversity.net.nz/google-and-chrome-no-go-xero/2008/09/03/#comment-8131</guid>
		<description>It is a defensive movement. Browser becoming a commodity, that is what Google wants - so the browser won&#039;t drive the navigation of the user</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a defensive movement. Browser becoming a commodity, that is what Google wants &#8211; so the browser won&#8217;t drive the navigation of the user</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

