<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SaaS pricing &#8211; what&#8217;s the best strategy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.diversity.net.nz/saas-pricing-whats-the-best-strategy/2008/07/10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.diversity.net.nz/saas-pricing-whats-the-best-strategy/2008/07/10/</link>
	<description>Commentary and Analysis for User-Centered Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:02:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: More on SaaS pricing&#8230; at diversity.net.nz</title>
		<link>http://www.diversity.net.nz/saas-pricing-whats-the-best-strategy/2008/07/10/comment-page-1/#comment-6142</link>
		<dc:creator>More on SaaS pricing&#8230; at diversity.net.nz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 18:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diversity.net.nz/saas-pricing-whats-the-best-strategy/2008/07/10/#comment-6142</guid>
		<description>[...] posted a little while ago about different pricing strategies for SaaS businesses. Briefly my view was that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posted a little while ago about different pricing strategies for SaaS businesses. Briefly my view was that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landon Hoover</title>
		<link>http://www.diversity.net.nz/saas-pricing-whats-the-best-strategy/2008/07/10/comment-page-1/#comment-5312</link>
		<dc:creator>Landon Hoover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 19:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diversity.net.nz/saas-pricing-whats-the-best-strategy/2008/07/10/#comment-5312</guid>
		<description>Ben,

The general concepts you set forth above have some validity, but let’s be honest…SaaS pricing and billing is more complex than a simple KISS strategy. If you want to successfully monetize your SaaS solution, a creative, but user friendly (functionally friendly) pricing strategy is necessary. 

I am far from an expert on pricing for SaaS, but  this is an extremely relevant and important topic; so, I would love to see you expand upon this in another post. There are companies that are now providing pricing solutions for SaaS providers. One such company is eVapt. There are a number of other companies similar to eVapt as well. Surveying these types of companies, learning about the pricing strategies they recommend, and/or comparing the companies and identifying the most useful for SaaS providers. 

If your up for it, it would be a great analysis that could help a lot of SaaS providers understand the available resources to help them with their pricing strategy and/or help them find “the best strategy.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben,</p>
<p>The general concepts you set forth above have some validity, but let’s be honest…SaaS pricing and billing is more complex than a simple KISS strategy. If you want to successfully monetize your SaaS solution, a creative, but user friendly (functionally friendly) pricing strategy is necessary. </p>
<p>I am far from an expert on pricing for SaaS, but  this is an extremely relevant and important topic; so, I would love to see you expand upon this in another post. There are companies that are now providing pricing solutions for SaaS providers. One such company is eVapt. There are a number of other companies similar to eVapt as well. Surveying these types of companies, learning about the pricing strategies they recommend, and/or comparing the companies and identifying the most useful for SaaS providers. </p>
<p>If your up for it, it would be a great analysis that could help a lot of SaaS providers understand the available resources to help them with their pricing strategy and/or help them find “the best strategy.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: julian</title>
		<link>http://www.diversity.net.nz/saas-pricing-whats-the-best-strategy/2008/07/10/comment-page-1/#comment-5242</link>
		<dc:creator>julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 23:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diversity.net.nz/saas-pricing-whats-the-best-strategy/2008/07/10/#comment-5242</guid>
		<description>Price too low and you&#039;ll fill the userbase with high demand price driven customers. We found that the 1-3 user account sizes contributed to 80% of our support. 

When we lifted prices earlier, about 5% of customers dropped off, but these were mostly the smaller accounts. As a result we saw support load drop about 30-50%.

Don&#039;t just aim to &#039;Get people onboard quickly&#039; as this can be a classic mistake. These low price customers can devour all your time, energy and resource. 

Re: To succeed in SaaS you need to sign people up quickly and keep them with you.
Not necessarily true... You don&#039;t have to &#039;Sign up people quickly&#039; - rather you have to &#039;sign up the right people&#039; over time.

ie: Would you rather earn 10 mill from 1,000 customers that are loyal and will stay with you year after year? or 10 mill from 100,000 customers that are fickle, roll with the fads, and could leave you tomorrow with no revenue?

The 1,000 userbase has an easier, more profitable model with lower support. 

The 100,000 userbase are demanding, require costly support and infrastructure, and if you&#039;re just getting off the ground, ie: Twitter, the userbase has the ability to kill your reputation quickly if you can&#039;t handle the load.

Set your pricing so you end up with a &#039;quality&#039; userbase and plenty of customers who &#039;value&#039; your service.

Scale naturally over time ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Price too low and you&#8217;ll fill the userbase with high demand price driven customers. We found that the 1-3 user account sizes contributed to 80% of our support. </p>
<p>When we lifted prices earlier, about 5% of customers dropped off, but these were mostly the smaller accounts. As a result we saw support load drop about 30-50%.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t just aim to &#8216;Get people onboard quickly&#8217; as this can be a classic mistake. These low price customers can devour all your time, energy and resource. </p>
<p>Re: To succeed in SaaS you need to sign people up quickly and keep them with you.<br />
Not necessarily true&#8230; You don&#8217;t have to &#8216;Sign up people quickly&#8217; &#8211; rather you have to &#8216;sign up the right people&#8217; over time.</p>
<p>ie: Would you rather earn 10 mill from 1,000 customers that are loyal and will stay with you year after year? or 10 mill from 100,000 customers that are fickle, roll with the fads, and could leave you tomorrow with no revenue?</p>
<p>The 1,000 userbase has an easier, more profitable model with lower support. </p>
<p>The 100,000 userbase are demanding, require costly support and infrastructure, and if you&#8217;re just getting off the ground, ie: Twitter, the userbase has the ability to kill your reputation quickly if you can&#8217;t handle the load.</p>
<p>Set your pricing so you end up with a &#8216;quality&#8217; userbase and plenty of customers who &#8216;value&#8217; your service.</p>
<p>Scale naturally over time &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

