<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The natural shift from Code sales to SaaS (Software as a Service)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.diversity.net.nz/the-natural-shift-from-code-sales-to-saas-software-as-a-service/2008/09/26/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.diversity.net.nz/the-natural-shift-from-code-sales-to-saas-software-as-a-service/2008/09/26/</link>
	<description>Commentary and Analysis for User-Centered Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:02:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Aditya Gholap</title>
		<link>http://www.diversity.net.nz/the-natural-shift-from-code-sales-to-saas-software-as-a-service/2008/09/26/comment-page-1/#comment-10177</link>
		<dc:creator>Aditya Gholap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diversity.net.nz/?p=1836#comment-10177</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I think distribution and remote management is the key with Saas. It really outlines the possibility of a &#039;free&#039; economy - something that the world has experienced to a really limited extent. I&#039;m interested in knowing how much proworkflow costs. I currently use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.deskaway.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Deskaway &lt;/a&gt; and its really awesome for the price. Something like $250 a year and i get loads of data storage, analytics, reporting, task management, issue management, scheduling et al. Am really really happy with it - just want to know what other companies are doing.. proworkflow seems to have a lot of heritage wrt to Saas i guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I think distribution and remote management is the key with Saas. It really outlines the possibility of a &#8216;free&#8217; economy &#8211; something that the world has experienced to a really limited extent. I&#8217;m interested in knowing how much proworkflow costs. I currently use <a href="http://www.deskaway.com/" rel="nofollow"> Deskaway </a> and its really awesome for the price. Something like $250 a year and i get loads of data storage, analytics, reporting, task management, issue management, scheduling et al. Am really really happy with it &#8211; just want to know what other companies are doing.. proworkflow seems to have a lot of heritage wrt to Saas i guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Web Service</title>
		<link>http://www.diversity.net.nz/the-natural-shift-from-code-sales-to-saas-software-as-a-service/2008/09/26/comment-page-1/#comment-9914</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Web Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diversity.net.nz/?p=1836#comment-9914</guid>
		<description>A couple of the key benefits of SaaS outlined very nicely there.  I particularly like the emphasis on the benefits of having a relationship between software provider and client, something I think is a huge plus, a movement away from the dictatorial mode of more traditional models.  As a brief list, what are the key benefits?  I&#039;m going to try and think of them...

Software as a Service
* No need to manage software - it&#039;s outsourced
* Service not product payment model more affordable for smaller companies

Data as a Service
* No need to manage data - it&#039;s outsourced
* Data kept up-to-date on rolling schedule (very important)
* Lots of opportunity for customising the software that uses the data, or at least the UI - &amp; lots of mashup opportunities

Overall picture
* Rolling payment model means SaaS and DaaS providers must maintain a good relationship with their clients

...
are there any I&#039;ve missed?  I&#039;m sure there are.  I&#039;ll be thinking about it and posting on my blog once I can remember.  Incidentally I should mention that a great SaaS and DaaS platform can be found at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thewebservice.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;theWebService.com&lt;/a&gt; which even allows people to manage their own data as a service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of the key benefits of SaaS outlined very nicely there.  I particularly like the emphasis on the benefits of having a relationship between software provider and client, something I think is a huge plus, a movement away from the dictatorial mode of more traditional models.  As a brief list, what are the key benefits?  I&#8217;m going to try and think of them&#8230;</p>
<p>Software as a Service<br />
* No need to manage software &#8211; it&#8217;s outsourced<br />
* Service not product payment model more affordable for smaller companies</p>
<p>Data as a Service<br />
* No need to manage data &#8211; it&#8217;s outsourced<br />
* Data kept up-to-date on rolling schedule (very important)<br />
* Lots of opportunity for customising the software that uses the data, or at least the UI &#8211; &amp; lots of mashup opportunities</p>
<p>Overall picture<br />
* Rolling payment model means SaaS and DaaS providers must maintain a good relationship with their clients</p>
<p>&#8230;<br />
are there any I&#8217;ve missed?  I&#8217;m sure there are.  I&#8217;ll be thinking about it and posting on my blog once I can remember.  Incidentally I should mention that a great SaaS and DaaS platform can be found at <a href="http://www.thewebservice.com/" rel="nofollow">theWebService.com</a> which even allows people to manage their own data as a service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

