<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When bureaucracy goes wrong&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.diversity.net.nz/when-bureaucracy-goes-wrong/2008/03/28/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.diversity.net.nz/when-bureaucracy-goes-wrong/2008/03/28/</link>
	<description>Commentary and Analysis for User-Centered Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:02:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Raf</title>
		<link>http://www.diversity.net.nz/when-bureaucracy-goes-wrong/2008/03/28/comment-page-1/#comment-1898</link>
		<dc:creator>Raf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 05:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diversity.net.nz/when-bureaucracy-goes-wrong/2008/03/28/#comment-1898</guid>
		<description>I replied on my post but will do so here also.

Does granting shares to someone above and beyond the grant money qualify under that rule? It doesn&#039;t sound like it to me. 

But I&#039;d be interested in further comment on whether this is the case as it may prevent the same thing happening to another company in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I replied on my post but will do so here also.</p>
<p>Does granting shares to someone above and beyond the grant money qualify under that rule? It doesn&#8217;t sound like it to me. </p>
<p>But I&#8217;d be interested in further comment on whether this is the case as it may prevent the same thing happening to another company in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Stephens, NZTE Group General Manager Business and Regional Capability</title>
		<link>http://www.diversity.net.nz/when-bureaucracy-goes-wrong/2008/03/28/comment-page-1/#comment-1897</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Stephens, NZTE Group General Manager Business and Regional Capability</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 04:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diversity.net.nz/when-bureaucracy-goes-wrong/2008/03/28/#comment-1897</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve responded to this company&#039;s post - your readers might be similarly interested.

NZTE strikes the right balance on funding processes

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nzte.govt.nz&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; New Zealand Trade and Enterprise&lt;/a&gt; is responsible for administering more than $70 million worth of business grant funding each year.

Coming as it does from taxpayers’ pockets, it is vital that we have clear guidelines on how the money can be used.

We say quite clearly that any service provider a company employs with its grant funding “must be independent and not financially or personally associated” with the company.   If we didn’t, it would be possible for companies to use the money to pay their own staff – something taxpayers wouldn’t be that happy about.

Yes, we have “played firm with the rules” but these rules were clearly stated in the contract with this company. It didn’t follow them and, as a government agency, we could not be expected to be any less firm. 

We strive to strike the right balance between processes that are prudent and administratively sensible and delivering a service that helps companies grow.  

This month’s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nzte.govt.nz/section/14709/18843.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; audit &lt;/a&gt; of the administration of our grant programmes by the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oag.govt.nz&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Auditor General shows that we are effectively and efficiently administering these programmes in keeping with the intentions of government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve responded to this company&#8217;s post &#8211; your readers might be similarly interested.</p>
<p>NZTE strikes the right balance on funding processes</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nzte.govt.nz" rel="nofollow"> New Zealand Trade and Enterprise</a> is responsible for administering more than $70 million worth of business grant funding each year.</p>
<p>Coming as it does from taxpayers’ pockets, it is vital that we have clear guidelines on how the money can be used.</p>
<p>We say quite clearly that any service provider a company employs with its grant funding “must be independent and not financially or personally associated” with the company.   If we didn’t, it would be possible for companies to use the money to pay their own staff – something taxpayers wouldn’t be that happy about.</p>
<p>Yes, we have “played firm with the rules” but these rules were clearly stated in the contract with this company. It didn’t follow them and, as a government agency, we could not be expected to be any less firm. </p>
<p>We strive to strike the right balance between processes that are prudent and administratively sensible and delivering a service that helps companies grow.  </p>
<p>This month’s <a href="http://www.nzte.govt.nz/section/14709/18843.aspx" rel="nofollow"> audit </a> of the administration of our grant programmes by the <a href="http://www.oag.govt.nz" rel="nofollow"> Auditor General shows that we are effectively and efficiently administering these programmes in keeping with the intentions of government.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

