• Intacct Summer 2010

     

    I recently took a briefing from Intacct (more on them here) giving me an update on their Q2 performance and also appraising me of product changes rolling out this summer. First some interesting business performance statistics. Intacct had added…

  • A Tale of Two Generations – Sage Languishes while Financial Force Innovates

     

    Software is undergoing a generational change – I thought I’d pull out an example to show what the old generation is doiing and contrast that to what the “cool kids” are doing. I was interested to read Dennis Howlett’s…

  • Financial Force gets Chatter(ing)

     

    Right about now, Jeremy Roche the CEO of SaaS Accounting vendor FinancialForce (more on them here) is on stage at CloudForce in New York telling the world about the integration they’ve made with Salesforce’s chatter functionality. I had an opportunity to speak with Roche a week or so ago under a strict embargo about the integration – it seems FinancialForce were particularly worried that any leak of the announcement might jeopardize their chances to speak at the event. Apparently salesforce CEO Marc Benioff is getting close to Apple CEO Steve Jobs in terms of exerting control over every little thing. But anyway, I digress.

    Firstly a bit of an update on FinancialForce – they’ve now got customers in over 40 countries and are seeing something of a polarization among their users – with many utilizing the entire accounting functionality, but many larger customers using FinancialForce as a kind of accounting “middleware” – facilitating the integration between large enterprise systems such as SAP, and smaller divisional systems. In fact FinancialForce recently showcased their integration with SAP, allowing sales data from a business unit using FinancialForce to be populated through to the SAP ledgers – see the diagram below:

    coda

    According to their PR blurb, FinancialForce:

    want(s) to help finance reach the whole (or part) of sales which as we know is a pain in the real world when wrangling via email. We are giving them the ability to initiate and be part of conversations that they wouldn’t normally be included in until a problem occurs or questions need answering. We think there’s real value in this and that it creates a different sense of where finance sits in the organization that can drive longer term value. The collaborative finance function – bringing accountants from the back office into the heart of the business. Since everything in business comes back to a financial transaction, the opportunities both internally and externally are compelling

    What Financial Force is releasing is an integration of their core accounting product with Chatter and a continuation of the interaction between the front and back office functions of an organizations. This leverages the ability of Chatter to follow all types of objects, be they people, opportunities, cases, customers etc. FinancialForce is enabling their “Chatterbox” a rules builder for chatter that Roche pointed out a couple of use cases for:

    • A financial manager, concerned about cashflow, might create a rule that shows them progress relating to every opportunity about (for example) $50000 that will be closing in the current quarter
    • A service manager may create a rule that allows them to follow all service cases with no progress activity for a certain number of days

    Check out the video below which gives an example business scenario for chatter:

    “;” alt=””>

    I’ve always been cautious about social tools that promise to revolutionize the enterprise – but I have to say that an integration between chatter and a third party force.com application really shows the promise these social tools can bring – dragging information kicking and screaming out of the app and to where a user needs it.

    CloudAve is exclusively sponsored by
  • Multi-Currency – The Maelstrom Continues

     

    Disclosure – One of my specialties is accounting software – I quote half a dozen vendors in the below post, some of whom I have past or current consulting relationships with. Full disclosure of all my industry affiliations can be seen here.

    A little while ago I posted discussing the recent introduction of multi-currency functionality for several accounting software vendors. My post received a quick and somewhat defensive reply penned by David Turner from FinancialForce. In his reply, Turner is fairly critical of other SaaS players, alleging that:

    it’s dawned on them that even SMBs need to handle more than one currency in today’s globalized market….it could be dangerous to treat vital functions such as multicurrency as an afterthought

    Without going into the technical details of Turner’s argument, suffice it to say he bought up a few examples of where what he deemed to be poorly executed multi-currency functionality could cause problems for organizations. In his reply I believe Turner ignored context – the companies I originally wrote about were servicing the micro to small market and not big business. As such their customers desired visibility above all, and are prepared to forego 100% accuracy in order to gain that visibility far below the price point of Turner’s company’s offering.

    I replied to Turners post commenting that:

    I guess there is some context to consider here. FAC (and FreshBooks for that matter) are aimed for micro to small businesses – for them it’s all about giving visibility of their position – that’s more important than to-the nth-degree accuracy… Which beings me back to a conversation I was having with someone today who mentioned the apocryphal accountant who spends all day in the pursuit of a rogue 22 cents missing from the ledger – at the end of the day he’d found the 22 cents but missed the entire point of “value add” in the process.

    While I have to admit my comment was a little flippant, and foreign exchange discrepancies should not be completely ignored, I still contend that there is a context issue in all of this.

    Deciding to illicit the help of other accounting vendors, I reached out to a number of people to get their opinion on the exchange. I was interested to talk to the traditional desktop accounting vendors – servicing many millions of customers and with either little or no multi currency functionality. Julian Smith, General Manager of MYOB (on premise vendor with over a million users) saw multi-currency as less than critical:

    the multi-currency feature is really only relevant to a minority of SMEs – our savvier users are avoiding any currency issues with their online businesses, by using their payment gateway to do the work for them… and they account in one currency…

    It’s important to note that Quickbooks only just introduced multi-currency capability – and managed to get to around five million customers without it – so the criticality or otherwise of multi-currency is debatable – a contention that Heather Villa, CEO of IAC-EZ and a CPA herself, concurred with:

    for the majority of small business the ability to say invoice and accept payment in multiple currency, may be a beneficial feature, but not one I see high on demand. As an accountant I currently have a client base of over 200 clients, and only 3 of them invoice in multi currency

    That said, most vendors agree that multi-currency, while still relevant to only a small number of SMBs, is becoming more important. From Daniel Druker, SVP at Intacct:

    more and more and smaller and smaller firms are transacting in multiple currencies – globalization and the internet is pushing down the barriers to working globally – both from a client and a vendor perspective – so more and more firms will benefit from some level of multi-currency capabilities.

    Interestingly MYOB’s perspective is that multi-currency introduces an inappropriate level of complexity into accounting products to be used by SMBs and is best handled by their accountants:

    There are significant complexities in multicurrency and for users who struggle with the fundamental principles of accounting, adding exchange gains and losses etc can be too much, many users therefore rely on their accountants assistance in this area. Effective usage of multi-currency solutions required significant financial and accounting experience to manage properly – regardless of the solution used. If foreign currency conversion  is a big part of business, often the client will pre-purchase currency notes to get a more favourable exchange rate, thereby making currency conversion data integration (from XE.com or others) inappropriate for their business.

    Which, at least to a certain extent conflicts with their statement that:

    Despite the complexities of multi-currency processes, their management and integration into MYOB’s desktop and SaaS solutions is a significant part of our R&D roadmap into the future.

    And from Rod Drury, CEO of Xero:

    …SMBs that do need multi-currency is still a large and significant market possibly with a higher affinity for modern solutions that improve productivity.

    Ed Molyneux, CEO of FreeAgentCentral:

    We believe there’s a small but important minority of our potential users at the micro (<10employees) end of the market who need multi-currency invoicing (and a somewhat smaller number who also need multi-currency banking)

    But it’s still about context – the complexity of the solution needs to be tailored for the needs of the organization. Druker again:

    multi-currency capabilities need to be matched to the size and capabilities of the target buyer… if you have simple requirements simple solutions can be very helpful… it’s very silly to ascribe the most complex requirements to very small businesses – they value simplicity and ease of use…Larger business have more complex requirements – they need automation to be efficient, they need flexibility to match their business process, they need exceptions and overrides for when non-standard things happen. But most importantly they are larger, their numbers are more material, they have people on staff who care about being precise, they have audit requirements

    And from Molyneux (quoting many of the assertions made in Turner’s critical post:

    our users couldn’t care less about ‘GL clutter’, ‘control of unrealized and realized losses and gains being in their hands’, and our software being ‘multi-everything international from the ground up

    And one more from Drury:

    We want to give the business owner the information they need to make decisions, not think about accounting

    SO… where does that leave us at the end of the debate? Clearly in a position of needing to understand the users of software work in – micro businesses are in a daily struggle for survival and trying to manage their time – tools that give them a degree of visibility into their financial position, regardless of the absolute accuracy of that view, will win in the end.

    I believe that, the multi-currency functionality rolled out by FreshBooks, Xero and FreeAgentCentral over the past few months is appropriately designed for their target customers – and that, after all, is what is important.

    CloudAve is exclusively sponsored by
  • Breaking: Salesforce.com Buys GroupSwim

     

    Big news this morning is the announcement of a deal that sees salesforce.com acquire GroupSwim (more on GroupSwim here). It seems the announcement came today but this has been brewing for sometime, GroupSwim VP of Customer Success Jason Rothbart’s Facebook status is showing him as a director of salesforce since August of this year.

    According to the GroupSwim site, existing users still have access “during this transition” but GroupSwim is not accepting any new registrations.

    The entire GroupSwim team (both US and Sweden based) has now been rolled into salesforce itself.

    Given salesforce’s recent acquisition/deal with Coda2go (now FinancialForce) and the recent *announcement* of salesforce chatter, this deal sees salesforce really starting to round out a complete business productivity suite, all able to be built, developed upon, and delivered on the force.com platform.

    I spoke with Rothbart who was understandably reluctant to give out much detail. He did say that:

    Salesforce.com and the GroupSwim team share a common vision for cloud computing and the next generation of collaboration for business. Stay tuned because we’re going to do exciting things with the technology.

    Which doesn’t really say much at all 😉

    At this stage they’re not addressing any questions on product roadmap but will update in the months to come.

    No details of the deal were available – however given the difficult economic climate and the relative dearth of information coming out of GroupSwim in the past few months, I can’t imagine it was a deal that set the world on fire.

    CloudAve is exclusively sponsored by

  • Coda2go and Salesforce – Oh the Irony

     

    There is some poetic irony in the news today as the originator of the SaaS acronym, salesforce.com, announces an investment in one of the copybook examples of moving from on-premises to SaaS, Coda2go. (More on Coda here). Here we see a marriage between salesforce – the king of the on-demand world, and Coda, a traditional vendor with a 30 year pedigree that has successfully switched to SaaS – it’s a meeting of two worlds – both in terms of technology, but also geographically – Coda is owned by Dutch company Unit 4 Agresso while salesforce is firmly entrenched stateside.

  • Ben Kepes – Disclosure Statement

    Disclosure statement – Updated June 19th, 2018: As a specialist, Ben is sometimes paid by companies for advice and speaking engagements. While these relationships could prove challenging when it comes to writing about those companies, Ben strives to retain…

...23456
...23456