SAP has long suggested that its HANA database will make a significant difference to products across its portfolio – today’s example, business and financial planning.

When SAP launched its HANA database, it clearly articulated the performance improvements that the in-memory approach would bring across the various different SAP services. And, while I have accused SAP of talking less about a business outcome, and far too much about a technology outcome, it has, over time, applied HANA to its product line to start delivering those benefits.

So given that context, it is interesting to see SAP announcing the general availability of the latest version of its planning and consolidation product. The solution, named in a very German-like way “SAP Business Planning and Consolidation (BPC) 11.0, version for SAP BW/4HANA” is all about the planning area of an organization – budgeting, forecasting, financial consolidation and reporting.

This is particularly interesting since the space (often referred to via the acronym BPM for business planning management) is awash with a number of third-party solutions – Host Analytics, Anaplan, Adaptive Insights are but a few examples. Once again we see a tension between the “best of breed” third-party solutions that focus solely on BPM and native solutions that are built on top of the core ERP being used. It’s a theme being played out across the industry – pretty much every ERP vendor does a dual dance; offering their own BPM functionality but also attracting ecosystem players in the BPM space.

SAP reflects on this best of breed versus suite theme when it points out that “by integrating the aggregation and computing power of SAP HANA with SAP S/4HANA and SAP BW/4HANA, finance departments no longer require separate systems for transactions and analytics. This simplified architecture eliminates data replication and reduces hardware and administration costs while allowing customers to perform real-time analysis and planning across entire ERP landscapes.”


It really is a case of horses for courses. There are those who point out that BPM is an overarching business process and hence one which should not be tied to any one particular system – BPM should equally be applied to ERP as it is to SCM and CRM, these proponents ay and, as such, a standalone solution gives the most flexibility by avoiding platform lock-in.

On the other side of the spectrum, we have those who point out that leveraging a third party tool does come with a price tag in terms of integration, data replication, and potential slower results.

Where your organization sits on the spectrum will depend on your own perception of the benefits or otherwise of a single technology platform. As for the HANA benefits, clearly HANA is an impressive piece of engineering and will speed things up, but as is so often the case, I suspect it will be less about technology and more about strategic decisions that convince organizations to purchase this SAP offering.

Ben Kepes

Ben Kepes is a technology evangelist, an investor, a commentator and a business adviser. Ben covers the convergence of technology, mobile, ubiquity and agility, all enabled by the Cloud. His areas of interest extend to enterprise software, software integration, financial/accounting software, platforms and infrastructure as well as articulating technology simply for everyday users.

1 Comment
  • Nice article you pretty much covered all the points related to SAP HANA. A point of explanation is that SAP IBP is a native SAP Cloud solution. Therefore, the new releases to the solution are available to the user directly and do not require a difficult upgrade. Also, most organizations are at different maturity levels in their planning lifecycle. SAP IBP gives them the advantage to start simple and add other elements as they themselves mature.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.