A couple of weeks ago I attended a private media briefing at the Israeli Embassy in Wellington where select New Zealand journalists were allowed to watch footage captured from the October 7th terrorist attacks in Israel.

The footage came from the cameras of both victims and terrorists and was, for obvious reasons, strictly controlled in terms of who was allowed to watch it. Not, before the conspiracy theorists suggest it, because it is Israeli propaganda created via the use of deepfake artificial intelligence. Rather, unlike the terrorists who chose to livestream their barbarity on social media, the Israeli Government wants to limit the psychological fallout that viewing this footage causes.

Anyway, we had a US-trained but NZ-based forensic pathologist talking at the event. Said clinician had volunteered to go to Israel to perform autopsies and victim identification on some of the victims. A veteran of September 11th and the victim identification thereafter, she had decades of this sort of work to draw from. In the clinical manner that only an individual who does this work for a living can muster, she explained the process for identification of disfigured, burned and dismembered remains.

I’m sure others will detail the sights that we saw, but suffice it to say between the video of a civilian being decapitated with a garden hoe, a soldier being dismembered with a hunting knife and the remains of children who were burned alive, it was indeed a harrowing event. And gives some context about what the tiny Jewish community in New Zealand is feeling.

But this article isn’t about those videos and images. I’ll leave it to others less personally scarred by the October 7th attacks than myself to tell that story. What I would like to do instead is crystal ball gaze and try and peer through the clouds to see what a future looks like for Gaza. Now I would be the first to admit that it’s hard for everyone connected to this story to opine dispassionately. We’re all just too traumatised right now.

I’m also aware that there are significant numbers of unaffected parties who are opining with reckless abandon with their reckons – those folks will, as always happens, move on to the next issue du jour. Those of us who remain – both on the Palestinian and Jewish/Israeli sides will be left to try and navigate a path into the future.

First a bit of context for those who have gotten their information about this conflict from TikTok videos and protest banners. This is a highly complex situation and fraught from all sides. Some data points:

  • For those suggesting that a two-state solution is an answer, bear in mind that this has been offered several times already but has always failed. We can argue about the reasons why, but just bear in mind that saying “two-state solution” is different from actually doing it
  • For those who paint Israel as an ethnic cleanser, bear in mind that close to a million Jews were forced from Arab countries over the past 80 or so years. Also bear in mind that roughly 20% of Israel’s population is made up of Arabs who live a life with equal rights.
  • For those who suggest the Israeli nation alone forsakes the Palestinian people, consider the hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refugees in Syria, Lebanon and Jordan who live impoverished lives with no rights of citizenship.

So, putting aside the “guilty party” in all of this (but without in any way resiling from a perspective that it was solely Hamas who broke the existing ceasefire on October 7th) what does the future look like, either realistically or aspirationally?

Putting my most optimistic hat on, I would suggest that we see a formulation of a two-state solution that both sides accept and comply with. We look at the broadly successful peace accords with both Egypt and Jordan and create something analogous more broadly with the Palestinian people. We see regime change in Gaza and an end to Hamas’ rule alongside a parallel political change in Israel (yes, believe it or not, many if not most Jews believe Benyamin Netanyahu is a barrier to peace). In my most starry-eyed of phases, I see Israelis and Palestinians both having their needs met in terms of self-determination.

In my more realistic moments, I remember that half a dozen times already the offer of a two-state solution has been made and at every turn interested Arab parties derail that offer. They do so while utterly disregarding what is in the interests of their brethren, the Palestinian people. I depressingly recall that peace with Egypt and Jordan happened with two nation-states that had so much to gain from the accords, whereas this time it means negotiating with Hamas whose very existence is only secured through continuing conflict. And, yes, I remember that Israeli is itself imperfect and an ultra-religious block has more political sway and influence than is ideal.

Overall I am, alas, slightly pessimistic. I don’t want a future where we, as Jews, need to engage in perpetual conflict just to survive. To (mis)quote former Israel PM, Golda Meir, Peace will come when both side loves their children more than they hate the other side. Let us all hope that day comes sooner rather than later.

Ben Kepes

Ben Kepes is a technology evangelist, an investor, a commentator and a business adviser. Ben covers the convergence of technology, mobile, ubiquity and agility, all enabled by the Cloud. His areas of interest extend to enterprise software, software integration, financial/accounting software, platforms and infrastructure as well as articulating technology simply for everyday users.

  • Deborah Coddington |

    You write so well, so powerfully, and so courageously in these polarised times. As someone with Jewish heritage but raised a Christian, I salute you. History is fascinating, interesting and yes, brutal. The only way forward is a two-state solution. It’s no use chanting ‘free Palestine’ without chanting ‘free Israel’ as well, if one wishes to be flippant. But flippancy has no place in this war. If only Palestine is freed, what is to become of the Israelis? Where do they go? The ignorant believe they have only been there since 1947/48.

  • Andrew MacLachlan |

    Well written as always Ben. I share your pessimism and optimism as resident of the Middle East.
    For sure, Hamas has to be ended, but we also need to be wary of a power vacuum. For this reason, a neutral 3rd party needs to administer the territory. Not the UN, not NATO.
    IMO it should be an Arab state with a strong military, strong rule of law, ethics, good relations with both Israel and Egypt, and be willing and able to invest and direct the rebuilding of the territory.
    There will be people who protest this “occupation” but the safety and ongoing peace between the Israeli and Gazan people should remain paramount.

  • Seen from my atheist christian raised european point of view (I’m in Switzerland):
    I share only pessimism, I truly tried to read and understand this israeli reaction to the coward and infamous 7th October as the “only way to eradicate Hamas”, a thing which for sure has to be done.
    Facts, sadly, suggest instead that the israeli army and soldiers are operating driven by a strong sense of revenge, over……. CIVILIANS.
    From indipendent news it seems they are shooting every moving human being (mainly children and women), press, ambulances, every building, hospitals, like unchained blind dogs. Hitting also their own citizens kept in hostage.
    In the global community (and in my mind) grows day by day the belief that who use the word “genocide” are not exaggerating reality.
    So what does the future look like, realistically?
    Once Hamas is over and Gaza is (probably) controlled by a foreign government or part of a wider Israel state, in ten-twenty years the few survived palestinian children will be driven by the same sense of revenge in reorganize the next militia or a second “hamas” and the story goes on and on.
    Isn’t this a concern for the people of Israel?
    Is this the smarter and long-sighted reaction for stability and balance in Israel and the whole MiddleEast?
    We already know is not the fair one.
    Please reply also in private if my comment seems too aggressive or polemical, but I’m really interested in your point of view.
    Thanks and best wishes, all my respect.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.