• Apptio Helps Enterprises Run IT As A Business

     
    Image representing Apptio as depicted in Crunc...

    Image via CrunchBase

    Apptio, with its headquarters in Bellevue, Washington, offers Technology Business Management (TBM) solutions to enterprise customers. It helps enterprises run their IT more efficiently like a business. Their TBM solutions helps enterprises make ROI optimized decisions using various templates, to fine tune how they run their IT. Their SaaS based business intelligence tools will make IT fit their organizational needs while saving tons of money.

    Technology Business Management is a new category of business management solutions that will help CIOs and IT managers take decisions on their IT environment based on the cost, quality and value using the industry’s best practices. CRM changed the way Sales teams operate and Technology Business Management has the potential to do the same thing to IT. In a way, enterprise IT is a blackbox for many of the businesses. TBM has the potential to change this situation and put IT managers in the drivers seat. Making proper decisions by analyzing the cost and benefits in IT is no easy task. Even in the traditional IT, where there is some amount of predictability in the costs, we have seen enterprises making bad financial decisions. With the proliferation of clouds in many different forms and with majority of expenditure moving from capital costs to operational costs, it gets more and more difficult to make good business decisions for IT. TBM is well poised to solve this hard problem and Apptio is emerging as one of the important players in this category. From the perspective of CIOs and IT decision manager, TBM is a must have kit while formalizing their cloud strategy.

    Apptio today announced new capabilities that enable IT leaders to make cloud cost comparisons leveraging the intelligence contained in Apptio’s Cost Transparency Templates. With this insight, IT can quantify the fully-loaded in-house cost of supporting traditional IT services, like email, CRM or storage, and compare that to the cost of moving them to external cloud service providers or internal private cloud operations. This enables IT and business leaders make informed decisions on which services would be the best, most cost effective candidates to support in the cloud.

    In the current cloud mania, there is so much confusion going on from both the cloud vendors and naysayers. The, sometimes, far reaching claims made by the vendors and the fear mongering adopted by companies who are on the verge of losing to cloud computing vendors, are confusing the IT managers in a big way. On one hand, we have “cloud naysayers” making claims that cloud computing will actually increase the enterprise spending and, on the other side, we have cloud evangelists making simplistic claims that cloud computing is a miracle cure for today’s terrible economy. Calculating the actual TCO is not an easy task. According to Lydia Leong, research director, Gartner, Inc., in an April 20, 2009 report entitled, “How to Select a Cloud Computing Infrastructure Provider, companies should “evaluate solutions on a total cost of ownership basis. Ensure that you capture the differences in employee time, licensing schemes and risk mitigation; don’t just compare the cloud with your hardware costs.”

    Apptio is trying to solve this exact problem. With this release, Apptio delivers integrated cloud cost analysis for each of its out-of-the-box Cost Transparency Templates, allowing IT to compare baseline costs with cloud offerings. Apptio’s Cost Transparency Templates provide best practices in costing standard IT objects such as servers, storage and labor. This offering will fundamentally change how an enterprise will approach the migration to the clouds. With the access to Apptio in their hands, IT managers can make informed decisions on which workloads to move to the clouds and which ones can stay inside the firewall by tapping into the private cloud infrastructure in the enterprises’ own datacenters. I am pretty excited by the potential of TBM solutions and Apptio is trying to emerge strongly in the market with this powerful IT intelligence dashboard.

    CloudAve is exclusively sponsored by

    Read more

  • Dyyno Ramps Up Their P2P Based Video Streaming Platform

     
    Image representing Dyyno as depicted in CrunchBase

    Image via CrunchBase

    Dyyno, the Palo Alto based company backed by Artiman Ventures and Startup Capital Ventures, offers a SaaS based video distribution platform that allows anyone from individuals to SMBs to enterprises share video and other media at a very low cost. The ease with which it can be done takes the IT out of the picture completely. They are the industry’s first 1080p HD video platform that taps into P2P architecture. They use a hybrid technology based on P2P and the cloud to deliver this high reliability video streaming platform. Dyyno online video platform supports three modes of streaming: LIVE for live events, WebTV for scheduled and creating your own online video channel, and VOD for on demand viewing and video asset management.

    Today, they announced the release of a new version of their broadcaster with additional features and EZ Broadcaster, a complete broadcasting toolkit in a box. Some of the features in the new version includes

    • Lots of presets making video broadcasting a child’s play
    • Advanced monitoring of the broadcasts
    • Broadcast failover
    • Dynamic recording
    • Video asset manager

    and more. The most interesting part about today’s announcement is the availability of EZ Broadcaster. This is a broadcasting kit that will help you stream from any video camera that has a RCA/S-Video output. This $49 kit will be a boon to many of the broadcasters wanting to stream good quality video.

    What I like about their service:

    • The biggest attraction for me was their use of P2P technology along with the Amazon cloud to deliver this platform. The reliability and scalability offered by this hybrid mix is too attractive
    • This fully featured platform supports the entire video lifecycle from capture to encoding to streaming to asset management to audience engagement to monetization to analytics
    • The fact that they make it easy to use any video camera instead of just the webcams in the laptop makes their platform very attractive

    What else I want from their service:

    • Definitely a Mac client and, possibly, a Linux client. Looks like they will soon be releasing a Mac version of their desktop software
    • I would love to integrate their platform with my Google Apps account so that it takes the access control of my organization
    • Not sure if they support HTML5 video. if not, it is definitely a need for me

    Overall, it is a pretty interesting offering. I was not convinced about how they can compete in a crowded marketplace including everyone from Youtube to Ustream to Brightcove. When I queried Vamshi Sriperumbudur, Head Of Marketing, about the tough landscape, he sounded confident. He told me that the reliability offered by their unique platform added with their price point for such high quality video will make them very attractive. They are definitely an interesting company to keep tabs and I am looking forward to see how they evolve.

    CloudAve is exclusively sponsored by

    Read more

  • Twitter Acquires Tweetie, What's Next?

     
    First one of Twitter’s investors, Fred Wilson, said this
    Much of the early work on the Twitter Platform has been filling holes in the Twitter product. It is the kind of work General Computer was doing in Cambridge in the early 80s. Some of the most popular third party services on Twitter are like that. Mobile clients come to mind. Photo sharing services come to mind. URL shorteners come to mind. Search comes to mind. Twitter really should have had all of that when it launched or it should have built those services right into the Twitter experience.
    Immediately, Nicholas Carlson of Silicon Alley Insider wrote a post wondering if Mr. Wilson dropped a bombshell and predicted about the following possibilities
    Bit.ly (as a URL shortener), TwitPic (as a photo uploader) and Tweetie (as an iPhone app) are now considered ‘core’ to the platform. They will either be bought or competed with.
    • Given that Twitter announced their own URL shortener and will need one for any [cost-per-click advertising] business model, we should assume Twitter will have its own URL shortener concept.
    • TwitPic could be bought or built. Probably easier to build, since there’s no magic there.
    • Tweetie is a big favorite of the Twitter crew, they love Loren Brichter’s stripped down design and cool sensibility, and it can probably be bought at an affordable price. Ie., Bit.ly downgraded; TwitPic built, Tweetie bought.
    Now Twitter has announced that they have acquired Tweetie (my favorite app before Echofon replaced it due to lack of development on the Mac client side)
    We’re thrilled to announce that we’ve entered into an agreement with Atebits (aka Loren Brichter) to acquire Tweetie, a leading iPhone Twitter client. Tweetie will be renamed Twitter for iPhone and made free (currently $2.99) in the iTunes AppStore in the coming weeks. Loren will become a key member of our mobile team that is already having huge impact with device makers and service providers around the world. Loren’s work won the 2009 Apple Design Award and we will eventually launch Twitter for iPad with his help.
    So my question is
    What’s next?
    CloudAve is exclusively sponsored by

    Read more

  • Making Linux Relevant In Desktop With SaaS

     
    Picture Credit: Ubuntu.comLinux has been trying hard to crack the desktop market for long. Being an open source evangelist, I do admit that it didn’t gain much traction in the desktop era dominated by Microsoft. There are many reasons for this including
    • Unpolished UI
    • Lack of support for some of the consumer devices like webcam, printer, etc.
    • More importantly, lack of availability of a good office suite comparable to Microsoft Office. Well, Open Office did a decent job of filling the gap but not many were ok with it
    Fast forward a few years and we are in cloud computing era now. Users are getting used to applications delivered as a service and many are realizing that the bloated Microsoft Office suite is too feature rich for their everyday use. Many are contended with the SaaS Office Suite like Google Docs, Zoho Office Suite (disclaimer: Zoho is the sole sponsor of this blog and this post is written independently using some information made available by a Canonical developer), Thinkfree, etc.. More importantly, SaaS era is making operating system irrelevant. We are seeing a shift in the users’ thinking on operating systems too. The proliferation of netbooks brought Linux to the desks laps of many users and this trend is only going to continue further and further.
    Yesterday Jamie Bennett, an Ubuntu developer from Canonical Inc., made a blog post that explained how users can integrate Zoho Office Suite into their Ubuntu desktop. They have a package available on their repository which will integrate Zoho Office suite into Ubuntu desktop. On the SaaS Office Suite front, I like both Google Docs and Zoho Suite (disclaimer: Zoho is the sponsor of this blog but this is based on my experience as an user) and Mr. Bennett has given reasons about why they chose Zoho over Google docs.
    First off, why Zoho and not, for instance, Google Docs. Both services offer great functionality and are very competitive but the ultimate decision came down to which suited our use case the most. What we wanted was for a user to double click on a document which would then seamlessly open ready for editing. From there the user would edit, read, and maybe even save it back to the local device. No fuss, no logging in, no other requirements, just open and get on with it. Similary, when a user launches the application on its own, we wanted the correct type of service to open ready for the user to concentrate on their document. The service that allowed us to do this was Zoho. Zoho allows the user to do all of this without ever registering or logging in. Of course you get online storage with Zoho if you do register, but if you choose not to you can still get a full featured experience.
    This is a pretty interesting move on many fronts. If this gains traction, we can see more and more adoption of Ubuntu on desktops. With OpenOffice.org coming under Oracle, this will give Linux users a chance to move away from Open Office. Having a light footprint helps convince users to move away from Open Office too. As more and more people embrace such SaaS applications from Linux desktops, we may even see businesses embracing both SaaS and Linux desktops instead of Microsoft Windows OS and their Office Suite. With Microsoft planning for a semi-cloud push with their Office Suite, a marriage between SaaS applications and a Linux distribution like Ubuntu is very useful. It will be interesting to see how these trends play out.
    CloudAve is exclusively sponsored by

    Read more

  • Enterprises Sneaking Into Public Clouds?

     
    Image representing newScale as depicted in Cru...

    Image via CrunchBase

    There is a widespread opinion among pundits and cloud practitioners that enterprises are running away from public clouds. Part of the reason for this impression is the real security concerns about the cloud and the rest is due to the misinformation campaign unleashed by vendors who have a lot to lose in the cloud era. However, the enterprises are more open minded than what these people want you to believe and they are tapping into the public clouds at varying levels.

    Recently newScale® Inc., the company offering IT service catalog software for enterprises, and Hyperstratus, the silicon valley based cloud computing consultancy firm, conducted an informal survey of 200 IT operations managers, infrastructure executives, developers, and architects from leading Global 2000 organizations and found some surprising results.

    Some of these results include

    • About 47% of the participants told that the developers in their company used external cloud providers in some form or other. Out of this, 32% told that their developers strictly use in test and dev environments and 15% said it is used in test, dev abd, even, production environments
    • When asked about the importance of a hybrid environment of internal data centers and external cloud providers, only 9% told that it is not important. A whopping 91% have answers ranging from important to very important with varying emphasis on internal data centers and external cloud providers.

    Even though this survey is not scientific, it does offer us a glimpse of what enterprise IT folks think about cloud computing. Contrary to conventional thinking, enterprises are not terrorized by the idea of cloud computing. In fact, when I spoke with various cloud vendors like Skytap, they told me that they see considerable traction with the enterprise customers. Many vendors pointed out that the enterprises are very open to adopting public clouds in the test and dev environments and some are even considering deployment on production environments. The above survey goes on to confirm these assertions.

    I would like to learn from Cloud Ave readers about what they think about enterprise public/external cloud adoption. If you are a member of enterprise IT team or a vendor selling to enterprises, please take the following survey to help us get better insight into the enterprise mindset. We appreciate your time in taking this poll.

    CloudAve is exclusively sponsored by

    Read more

  • Cloud Computing Outside the US

     
    Photo Credit: Wordpress.orgInformation Week has an article that talks about the difference between the US and European Cloud Computing markets. The article points out to some numbers given by The 451 Group’s William Fellows 
    The 451 Group’s William Fellows in a “Cloud Outlook 2010” Webcast, says that 57% of spending on cloud computing is done in the U.S., 31% in Europe and 12% in Asia. But when it comes to the adoption of infrastructure as a service, the way to leap the furthest into cloud computing by using Amazon’s EC2 or Rackspace, 93% of that spending is done in the U.S., 6% in Europe and 1% in Asia.
    In fact, this matches with the kind of numbers I am getting while talking to vendors from around the world. Couple of months back, I spoke with Christoph Streit, CTO of Scale Up Technologies, on the same topic. He told me that the European market is tough and they are lagging behind US by at least one year.
    I asked them about the European cloud market and what kind of traction they are seeing in the market. Christoph told me that they are finding it difficult to convince customers to move their assets to cloud. He told me that they have to put considerable efforts to educate customers about the benefits of cloud computing. In his opinion, European market is lagging behind US market by at least a year on cloud adoption.
    In fact, Christoph even told me that they are spending valuable time and resources educating the customers about cloud computing than actually selling it to them. I have spoken to couple of other European vendors and analysts since then and they all share the same opinion about a difficult terrain in Europe. The lack of understanding about the benefits of cloud computing along with a difficult terrain in terms of privacy laws makes cloud computing a tough sell in the market. However, it is possible to overcome the difficulty associated with their privacy laws with the help of an open federated cloud computing ecosystem. Regional players like Scale Up Technologies are playing a crucial role in bridging this gap.
    The lack of enthusiasm for cloud computing beyond US is not restricted to Europe alone. As noted by the 451 Group Analyst, Asia is far behind even Europe in terms of cloud computing spending. I am a partner in a Cloud Consultancy firm in India and we are observing the same trend there too. It is tough to convince the businesses about the benefits of cloud computing. Probably it is cultural but they are reluctant to give up their existing infrastructure and move to clouds. There is a long way to go before cloud computing can gain steam in countries like India and other parts of Asia. However, we are hearing from IBM that Chinese government is showing some interest in setting up cloud infrastructure for the consumption of their local governments.
    I asked our own Ben Kepes about the status of Cloud Computing in Australia and New Zealand. Since he has been travelling a lot to different parts of Australia and New Zealand running Cloudcamps and talking to both users and vendors, I thought he can give some insight into the trends there. According to Ben, the cloud adoption is very low but some of their big traditional vendors are starting to roll out IaaS offerings. He said he has seen some big companies adopting Google Apps but it is not a widespread trend. He attributes the lack of enthusiasm to poor internet connectivity in that area and the enterprise concerns about cloud security.
    In short, cloud computing is a more local trend and we have a long way to go before it becomes an universal phenomena. This also highlights the tremendous opportunities available for more and more players from these countries. As I have always said, we will have an open federated cloud ecosystem in this world and not a handful of monopoly players like some pundits predict. What do you think? I would love to hear from users and vendors in different parts of the world. Please feel free to jump in if you have any comments.
    CloudAve is exclusively sponsored by

    Read more

  • Under the Radar – Infrastructure, Monitoring And More

     

    Under The Radar, a series of conferences organized by Dealmaker Media, is a platform for startups to launch themselves in front of some of the top minds in industry is organizing their cloud event on April 16th, 2010 with a focus on Commercializing the Cloud, highlighting the fact that Cloud Computing has moved from the hype phase to increasing enterprise adoption. As a media partner, we have been talking about this event for sometime now. Zoli wrote a post introducing this year’s event on April 16th, 2010. Last week, I wrote a post highlighting some of the participating companies who are either cloud brokers or offer technologies that could help cloud brokers. In this post, I will highlight some other participants in the infrastructure and monitoring space and end the post with an option for a special $200 discount. The choice of the companies below are made randomly with no specific preference.

    • Aprigo: Aprigo offers an interesting data management solutions that could help the customers meet the compliance requirements. One one hand, their solution offers a great protection against data breaches, governance, etc. and, on the other hand, it helps the users with powerful visualizations of their unstructured data and optimization of data storage. They offer a free version and a pro version with the paid version offering more capabilities than the free plan. Aprigo is the only suite of data management apps that provides a holistic view of your company’s data without breaking the bank.
    • Cloudant: Cloudant is an interesting company among all the participants. The reason they came under my radar is because, like me, the founders of the company are also ex-physicists. They were part of the MIT team working on the Large Hadron Collider and their frustrations with the lack of tools to handle petabytes of data from LHC lead to this company. In short, Cloudant is CouchDB in the cloud. Thus Y-Combinator startup offers redundant and scalable storage across multiple clouds and expose their service as a RESTful JSON API. They have a free plan with 1 GB of space and it is currently in beta. I suppose they have plans for more products in the future.
    • Cloudshare: Cloudshare came under my radar couple of months back when I was doing some research on one of their competitors. I had a chance to speak to them about their product and they do have an interesting enterprise solution where one can share an entire IT environment just like how we share files or documents. Their software makes it super easy to mimic an IT infrastructure to give a demo or training. Vendors like VMware, Cisco, SAP and others have already adopted Cloudshare’s product to extend their virtual infrastructure to the cloud.

    There are many other interesting companies in the mix and you should check out their schedule for the complete list of participating companies and their grad circle. If their schedule excites you, then you should register for the event using the special $200 discount for out readers by visiting this link.

    CloudAve is exclusively sponsored by

    Read more

  • Do You Sell Multi Year Contracts?

     

    Photo Credit: Pandell.comOne of the key selling point of SaaS is the pay as you go model. In fact, some people even consider this to be part of the very definition of cloud computing. Yesterday, Phil Wainewright wrote a post about SaaS vendors selling multi-year contracts. He quotes a talk given by CEO of Workbooks.com, John Cheney, at the EuroCloud UK meeting where Mr. Cheney talks about the advantages of selling such multi-year contracts to the customers.

    He argued that the high startup costs of operating and growing an as-a-service business generate such a huge funding requirement that you have no choice but to sell one-, two- and three-year contracts to get cash in the business. Booking long contracts doesn’t increase the bottom line — the revenue can only be recognised as it is incurred — but getting the upfront payments in the bank certainly boosts the cash balance.

    This is not a new argument per se. Salesforce.com took the same approach when they were faced with crunch after the dot com bust. In fact, we can even attribute the longevity of Salesforce.com to this move to selling multi-year contracts (Read Marc Benioff’s book Behind The Cloud for more information on this strategy by Salesforce). In fact, I also share Phil Wainewright discomfort towards this approach but I also how this could help a SaaS startup plough through the marketplace with limited access to cash.

    I am not religious on the pricing model as such. However, i feel that a customer, at least in the initial stages, will be empowered if they stick to the pay as you go model. Once they are convinced about the service and reliability of the vendor, they could go for a long term contract. I am pretty convinced on the right path from the buyer point of view. However, I would like to hear from the SaaS vendor side. If you are a SaaS vendor, I would request you to take the following poll. I would also appreciate if you can offer your thoughts on the topic in the comments below.

    CloudAve is exclusively sponsored by

    Read more

  • Making Money In Open Source: Does It Matter?

     

    Yesterday, I attended the GigaOm bunker series on Open Source and Cloud Computing. The event had two panels, one featuring Larry Augustin of SugarCRM and Jim Zemlin of Linux Foundation and the other with Joe Tobolsk, Rich Wolski, Shelton Shugar and Tom Hughes Croucher. There were some interesting discussions on both panels and an overall agreement that open source is beneficial for cloud computing (in the words of some of the participants, the single most reason for the very success of cloud computing). But there was one question that turned out to be controversial and it is about who makes money from Open Source. Derrick Harris from Giga Om Pro offers a good coverage of this question and the ensuing discussion in this post. During the event, I had fun observing the debate and I thought I will offer my views here.

    Roughly, the participants in the discussion can be split into three camps. On one side, there were those who went gaga over how open source is successfully making money and, on the other end, there were skeptics who were wondering why Open Source is not making big bucks like their proprietary counterparts. In between these two camps were the so called “moderates” who argued that open source need not make big money but they enable others, like Web 2.0 vendors and the current day cloud vendors, make big bucks. They even showed the example of how open source is single handedly keeping Wall Street running and, thereby, helping some people make really big bucks.

    My thoughts about Open Source making big money are summarized below

    • The biggest mistake made by most of the participants in the room is to view Open Source as a business model. This is not something new. Ever since Open Source started gaining traction in the business world, various players involved in the game tend to view Open Source as a business model. In 2007, in response to a debate between various pundits on the true nature of Open Source, I had argued that Open Source is not a business model but a philosophical platform on top of which various business models play the game. In that blog post, I had compared Open Source to basic science and I would love to dig a bit more on this comparison here. If you tend to view basic science as a business model (many people in the industry tend to see everything using the lens of monetization and, even in a capitalistic country like US, it is not necessary), you will realize that it is one of the biggest money losing endeavor in this world. However, basic science is the single reason why we, as a society, have advanced to what we are today, including in the area of commerce. Basic science didn’t make money but it enabled the society to progress through innovation and allowed businesses to make money by productizing the results of basic science research. Essentially, basic science acted as a platform acting as an enabler of innovations and led to various business models based on these innovations. I see Open Source in a similar vain. Open Source is a platform that enables innovation by sharing of source code and allows some businesses to make money by layering a business model on top of it. Some business models may work and many might just fail depending on whether the business model is compatible with the nature of Open Source. Failure of a particular type of business model does not imply the failure of open source itself. I don’t believe in having a metric to measure everything (do we have a metric to measure happiness yet?). But, if we ever have to have a metric to measure the success of open source, that quantity will be proportional to the amount of innovation it has enabled and independent of the money that was directly made from open source itself. If we grasp this point about the true nature of open source, then Simon Crosby’s comments about the presence of proprietary components in many successful open source products will be hardly surprising. In this world view, having proprietary addons to the open source core is one of the successful business models on top of the Open Source Platform. This is not the only one and there are others including Redhat’s approach. There are many more to come in the future. Business models on top of open source may come and go but the basic philosophy will stay intact for a long time to come.
    • Another mistake, in my view, is about the metric they use in measuring the success. They tend to use the yardstick they use in the proprietary world to measure the success of Open Source. One of the biggest success of Open Source from an economics perspective is the commoditization of software. The proprietary vendors made big money by the exclusivity enjoyed by their products and, in most cases, the lack of viable competition. This offered them the leverage to charge exorbitant prices to their products. The very freedom offered by Open Source breaks the spine of this exclusivity enjoyed by these software vendors. In fact, this freedom opens up an unique opportunity for more than one business to profit from the same software. The inability of vendors to charge sky high prices and the forking of business opportunities by many people will ensure that the idea of big bucks doesn’t enter the Open Source world.
    • This point is more political than technological. The American idea of capitalism measures the success of capitalism in terms of the number of people who won big but my idea of capitalism is not about winning but about creating opportunities for individuals to compete. In my world view, there may not be one single big winner but many winners having their own piece in the marketplace. The comparatively moderate economic success of companies running their business on top of open source platform fits this worldview of mine. Open source empowers businesses of all sizes to compete in an equal footing, with each getting a piece of the pie based on many factors including the availability of some unique features which users found compelling, fanatical support, etc.. This spreading of opportunities ensures that no single business is hugely successful but it creates many successful businesses. Some people in America may call it socialism but it is capitalism for me. Empowering more and more people to compete in the marketplace is capitalism IMHO and open source does it very well.

    Well, these are some of my thoughts on why Open Source is not making big money like their proprietary counterparts. Open Source is a philosophical idea that fosters innovation and enable many business to compete in the marketplace. Like basic science, it may not make big money but it will enable big ideas which, in turn, may make big money. Like any commoditized marketplace, the money is not going to be huge for any single player. It is important for us to understand the true nature of open source. If we understand it correct, we can better utilize this platform to innovate better. If you are a business looking to make big money with software, then open source is not the right path for you. You are better off with proprietary approach. Open source will still survive by the very itch in the hands of users (read companies in the cloud based world).

    CloudAve is exclusively sponsored by

    Read more

  • Groundwork Open Source Getting Ready For Private Clouds

     
    Image representing Groundwork Open Source as d...

    Image via CrunchBase

    Recently I wrote about Groundwork Open Source, an enterprise level network monitoring tool built on top of Nagios. Today I am hearing that they are preparing themselves to target enterprises who are using private clouds. They are pretty close to offering a monitoring solution for Eucalyptus clouds. We all know that Eucalyptus is hot among the enterprises looking to implement cloud like capabilities, also known as private clouds, inside their datacenters. By focusing on Eucalyptus, GWOS is positioning themselves to sell to enterprises taking the Eucalyptus route to private clouds. Since there is not much information available to me at this moment, I couldn’t offer more details but I will post in this space once I hear from them.

    On a related note, GWOS is announcing the release of Ubuntu based Enterprise Quickstart virtual appliance. Similar to their existing offerings, this is also priced right at a $59 per year price point. In fact, an Ubuntu based appliance makes complete sense to me. We are seeing a growth in the use of Ubuntu servers inside the enterprise datacenters. Similarly, Ubuntu servers have huge traction inside Amazon EC2 ecosystem. Even though Redhat has a big marketshare in the Linux server market, Canonical is pushing hard to compete with Redhat. In fact, their prospects improved dramatically when they tightly integrated Eucalyptus in their Ubuntu Enterprise Cloud edition. So, it makes complete sense for GroundWork Open Source to release an Ubuntu based network monitoring appliance.

    Off late, I am focusing more on open source products like GWOS, Eucalyptus, etc.. In fact, I see these open source components as a necessary element for the evolution of an open federated cloud ecosystem. I see the next two years to be crucial for this and products like Eucalyptus, Ubuntu, GWOS, etc. are going to play an important role. Let us wait and see how this space shapes up.

    CloudAve is exclusively sponsored by

    Read more

...51011121314...
...51011121314...